Feds approve 1,000 applications for drone flights

The Federal Aviation Administration has approved 1,000 applications for nonmilitary drone flights.

The exemptions were granted this week under a section of federal law that allows the Transportation Department to wave requirements for FAA approval for drone flights that are operated outside of restricted airspace and below 200 feet.

The FAA said in a statement that the exemptions were part of a “continuing effort to safely expand and support commercial unmanned aircraft operations in U.S. airspace.”

“Companies and individuals from a broad spectrum of industries are taking advantage of the Section 333 exemption process,” the agency said.”Many of the grants the FAA has issued allow aerial filming for uses such as motion picture production, precision agriculture and real estate photography,” the FAA statement continued. “The agency also has issued grants for new and novel approaches to inspecting power distribution towers and wiring, railroad infrastructure and bridges.”

The FAA is in the process of developing regulations for allowing a rapid expansion of the use of commercial drones in the U.S.

The agency has faced tremendous pressure to approve such an expansion of nonmilitary drone use from companies such as Amazon, who have said the technology can be used to make speedier online deliveries.

Police and other law enforcement groups were also seeking approval to use the technology, and the FAA has investigated several drone incidents that occurred in conjunction with photography at college and professional sporting events.

The section of law that allows the FAA to grant drone exemptions gives the Transportation Department the authority to drop a requirement that operators of the technology apply for a certificate of airworthiness that is normally required for flights that are formally considered an aircraft.

The definition of drones as aircraft under the FAA’s proposed rules has riled recreational operators of the devices who consider themselves hobbyists instead of pilots.

The FAA’s rules define small drones as devices that weigh less than 55 pounds and require them to be operated at heights that are less than 500 feet and speeds that are less than 100 miles per hour.

The regulations also call for drone flights to be limited to daytime hours and conducted only by U.S. residents who are older than 17. Drone operators are also prohibited under the FAA proposal from conducting flights that take the devices out of their line of vision — a big blow to companies like Amazon that have touted the possibility of using the technology to conduct deliveries.

The rules make drone operators responsible for avoiding collisions with manned aircraft that are in the same airspace as the devices, and prohibit drone flights that “fly over people, except those directly involved with the flight.”

The FAA said this week that it has streamlined the exemption process for the drone rules “to make it easier for operators to access the nation’s airspace.

“In March, the agency began issuing ‘blanket’ Certificates of Waiver or Authorization (COAs) to Section 333 exemption holders,” the agency said.

“This COA allows flights anywhere in the country at or below 200 feet except in restricted airspace, close to airports, and other areas, such as major cities where the FAA prohibits UAS operations,” the FAA continued. “Previously, an operator had to apply for and receive a COA for a particular block of airspace, a process that can take as long as 60 days.”

Heath Consultants to develop methane-detecting UAS

By Patrick C. Miller | August 05, 2015
  • The fully autonomous methane-detecting UAS developed by Heath Consultants will be based on the InstantEye quadrotor UAV.
    PHOTO: HEATH CONSULTANTS INC.

Heath Consultants Inc. has been selected by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) to develop and demonstrate an unmanned aerial system (UAS) to monitor methane, a greenhouse gas.

Based in Houston, the company will work in collaboration with Physical Sciences Inc. (PSI), Thorlabs, Princeton University and University of Houston on the Remote Methane Leak Detector (RMLD) Sentry which will continuously monitor, locate and quantify methane leaking from natural gas production sites.

Under an ARPA-E grant, Heath Consultants said its goal is to develop and demonstrate a low-cost UAS to reliably detect and measure methane leakage. The fully autonomous system combines a miniaturized version of the laser-based RMLD; the InstantEye quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle with self-directed flight patterns; mid-infrared lasers; and advanced wind and plume models.

The three-year program will test prototype units at selected field sites. According to Heath Consultants, the RMLD Sentry system is intended for widespread deployment to reduce the environmental impact and cost of natural gas leakage.

Heath Consultants specializes in natural gas detection technologies and services, partnering with research and development organizations and industry trade associations. It provide products and services to various utility markets.

PSI provides contract research and development services to both government and commercial customers. With an emphasis on applied research, PSI develops advanced technologies for aerospace, chemical, defense, energy, environmental, manufacturing and medical applications.

http://www.uasmagazine.com/articles/1194/heath-consultants-to-develop-methane-detecting-uas

Lockheed Martin releases UAS traffic management system

By Luke Geiver | August 05, 2015
  • Lockheed Martin’s flight management system is now available to the UAS community through an online flight service that feeds flight plan information directly to the FAA.
    PHOTO: UAS MAGAZINE

Lockheed Martin has made its unmanned aircraft systems management system available to the UAS community. The UTM system is an online flight service that feeds flight plan information directly into the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s National Airspace System. According to Lockheed, “UAS operators now have an option of reporting operating areas via this system.”

Paul Engola, vice president of Lockheed Martin’s Transportation and Financial Solutions business, said that the corporation’s objective is to provide an “open, standards-based system that individual operators and other private UTM systems can use to interact seamlessly and securely with the NAS.”

“We look forward to partnering with UAS operators and manufacturers to help create a system that supports the safe coexistence of manned and unmanned flight,” Engola added.

In addition to its own UTM system, Lockheed Martin is working with NASA on a system that features capabilities including standards-based software interfaces that allow UAS ground control stations and other UTM platforms to interact directly with Lockheed’s. Capabilities also include the ability to monitor UAS to determine if they remain in their intended operating area, and, notification to air traffic control when UAS encroach on controlled airspace.

For additional information on Lockheed Martin’s system, visit: www.1800wxbrief.com

http://www.uasmagazine.com/articles/1192/lockheed-martin-releases-uas-traffic-management-system

Nevada far behind top states for commercial drone use

Drone_t653

The number of companies in Nevada approved for commercial drone flights is about on par with most states but lags far behind leaders like California and Arizona, according to an analysis of the first 500 waivers issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.

Nevada companies were issued six exemptions from the rules otherwise banning commercial drone flights.

California, meanwhile, led the nation with 70 approved operators, followed by Texas with 46, according to an analysis of FAA data released last week.

Florida had the third most exemptions at 40, and then Illinois with 18 and Arizona with 17.

The analysis covered a period from September, when the FAA started issuing exemptions, through about June. But with an expedited approval process in place, the FAA announced Tuesday that it has now issued 1,008 exemptions.

Although the FAA allows hobbyists to fly small drones, it maintains a blanket ban on the use of drones for commercial activity without an exemption.

The exemptions, which cover more than 20 industries and 48 states, are meant as a stopgap measure as the FAA creates a final rule.

Industry advocates see an almost infinite number of applications for commercial drones, especially in aerial photography and filming. The exemptions the FAA issued to Nevada companies, for instance, allow the use of commercial drones for activities that range from news gathering to the aerial mapping of mines.

In the analysis of FAA exemption data, California companies manufactured 50 platforms used by approved operators, the most of any state. Nevada companies did not manufacture any platforms used by approved operators.

Nevada, as one of six drone test sites designated by the FAA and having recently passed tax breaks to spur aviation manufacturing, is seeking to attract more unmanned aircraft activity. The Governor’s Office of Economic Development advertises multiple testing sites, optimal weather conditions for flights and a trained workforce, given the proximity of Creech Air Force Base, a hub of the U.S. military drone operations.

Drone hits Great American Tower, breaks glass

http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2015/08/04/drone-hits-great-american-tower-breaks-glass/31123195/

 

A drone flying through downtown Cincinnati struck the north side of Great American Tower on Tuesday afternoon and broke glass that fell on top of the building’s garage.

The drone struck a glass pane between the 28th and 29th floors sometime between noon and 1 p.m. Tuesday, according to José Marques, a spokesperson for Western & Southern Financial Group and Great American Tower.

Marques said some glass fell from the pane that shattered, but no one was injured.

The Cincinnati Police Department responded to the incident, according to Marques. Police from Cincinnati’s Central Business District were not immediately available for comment.

Recreational aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles are not permitted in the Downtown area, including airspace over the Ohio River, Great American Ball Park and Paul Brown Stadium, according to the City of Cincinnati.

Drone use is also prohibited within five miles of the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport  and the Lunken Airport.

Homeland Security Issues Warning About Drones

 

Homeland Security Issues Warning About Drones

Once again the subject of the potentiality of drones being used by terrorists has hit the news, this time by CBS that learned the Dept. of Homeland Security sent out an intelligence assessment to law enforcement agencies across the US regarding drones being used as weapons.

The bulletin warned that Unmanned Aircraft Systems or UAS, could be used by terrorists in attacks.

This comes to no surprise, however to the public that has increasingly seen drones become a nuisance and menace. Irresponsible operators of the drones, including news companies, kids, adults, and recreational people, are commonly now the subject of news stories. Drones can be easily modified to carry such things as cameras and even firearms. Aficionados of the technology come up with ingenious ways to “mod” these devises and many show up on YouTube videos.

The demonstrations of what these drones can do is frightening. Several videos show modded drones firing with astonishing accuracy, paint balls and real bullets. Armed with such a device, criminals could wreak havoc by sending several of the armed drones into crowded places and firing upon innocent citizens. The drones can carry a good amount of ammunition and can easily be recalled to equip more.

That being said, the federal officials see a rising trend in the use of UAS devices. Terrorists have a plethora of targets that they could attack and the drones are not that expensive and if destroyed, others can replace it. A fleet of such devices armed with bullets or chemical or viral payloads would be difficult to detect and stop before they let loose their hazardous cargo.

The bulletin points to the assessment that the majority of UAS encounters are benign but the potential for security vulnerabilities is alarming. This bulletin is considered unusual but none the less important.

The issue here is that any new technology can be used for wrongdoing. When new devices emerge, there are those with nothing less than ill intent who will use such technologies for their nefarious actions.

At present drug dealers use drones to deliver significant amounts of drugs, survey areas for police and transfer money. It’s a clear sign that at some point, some sinister force or some mentally deranged persons will use drones maliciously. It’s not a matter of ‘if’ anymore, it’s a matter of ‘when’. So far we’ve seen drones interfere with rescue and police operations, drones almost hitting planes, drones crashing into people and property. Just one drone armed with an explosive could cause misery and mayhem and there would be no way to stop them.

This calls for countermeasures where sensitive buildings, cities, towns, need a radar type detection system for drones. To be able to track them. Perhaps issuing official licenses for the operation of such devices would be sound.

The other problem is the technology of drones is accelerating. Aficionados are working diligently to make smaller, faster, stealthier, and noiseless drones. So are the big drone companies. Let us not forget drones for traveling underwater too. Bigger drones that can carry heavier payloads are in the works and other variations on a theme.

It looks like if drones continue to become a menace, they’ll be licensed or banned. If that comes to pass the public will issue an outcry unless a drone attack is so devastating that the public becomes in fear of them.

We’ll just have to wait and see what happens next.

Drones to rein man-animal dispute around forest areas

Drones in forests
 

Drone technology is fast finding use in almost every sector including security, search and rescue, surveillance, law and order, etc. The latest use of drone technology is as a tool in the man-animal conflict in and around forest areas.

Man and animals are always at loggerheads especially in the buffer zone around national parks. To prevent such attacks scientists at the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) in Dehradun have started using drone technology to prevent any clash between man and wild animals.

WII’s wildlife scientist, K Ramesh, in-charge of the project talking to PTI said that besides surveillance, drones have been found to be useful in preventing conflicts. Drones can be flown for short distances around the periphery of the forests to keep track of elephants and other large mammals which have strayed into nearby villages.

If the villagers notice wild animals in the close vicinity of human habitats, they can inform the forest department officials who can dispatch a drone equipped with GPS and high-resolution cameras to pinpoint the location of the wild animals. It could be safely driven back into the forest without any danger to humans as well as the animal.

Elephants can be particularly dangerous as they can destroy standing crops and are usually difficult to control especially when they are in heat.

Samir Sinha, Corbett Tiger Reserve’s field director, said that an eye on the sky in the form of a drone will make a lot of difference in wildlife management.

Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve director – Pradeep Vyas said drones could act as a force multiplier for them. It will be possible to scan an area as big as 15 to 20 sq km from one location.

Trials have been completed in Panna Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh. The wildlife department is improving the UAV to add features like night vision, landing capabilities, increased endurance and speed. The air-frame of the UAV is also being improved to make it able to fly in the rain.

Drone safety record good — so far

jimmyharmon

By Doug Thompson

No aircraft has hit a drone in Arkansas or anywhere else in the United States, Federal Aviation Administration records show. Airport managers, regulators, pilots, aircraft passengers and private drone operators want to keep that record.

“Hitting a bird can bring down an airplane,” said James Smith, manager of the Springdale Municipal Airport. “Imagine what a drone can do.” FAA rules allow a maximum weight of 55 pounds for private drones, which use electric motors powered by batteries.

Sales of drones for private used by hobbyists are not tracked by the FAA. The U.S. Consumer Electronics Association projects sales of 700,000 remotely piloted aircraft this year, ranging from small remote control planes to large “Unmanned Aircraft Systems” capable of carrying a large, professional-grade camera. Worldwide sales of the larger craft are expected to be 80,000 units this year, according to industry accounts.

The FAA expects to approve its 1,000th request for private, commercial use of drones sometime this week, said Les Dorr, agency spokesman. Any drone used for a commercial purpose requires both an exemption from the noncommercial restriction by the FAA and operation by someone who holds a regular pilot’s license, just like that required to fly an aircraft.

Those requirements would change under a set of rules proposed by the FAA in February, said both Dorr and Tom McMahon, spokesman for the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, an industry group. The new set of rules would set up a certification process just for drone operators.

Parties interested in commercial drones range from photographers to real estate companies, news organizations and farmers wanting to monitor crops. Many existing restrictions on drones would still apply, such as operation being limited to daylight hours and only as long as the operator keeps the drone within his direct line of sight.

Drones can be hard to see even when ground clutter below them isn’t a factor for a pilot in a descending airplane, and they are too small to be tracked by airport radar, Smith said. Drone owners in Northwest Arkansas have been very responsible, though, Smith said.

“I’ve received a grand total of one telephone call about a drone, and it was the mother of someone who lost his and, as far as we can tell, it was never near the airport,” he said.

The overwhelming majority of drone operators around the country have also been responsible and cooperative with the FAA in helping refine a set of proposed rules, Dorr said. Those proposals drew more than 4,500 comments during the process of drafting them, he said.

“U.S. airspace is the most complex and crowded in the world, but we’ve met challenges before,” Dorr said. “The FAA is in the business of getting new technology into the nation’s airspace safely.”

The proposed regulations are practical and workable, said Jimmy Harmon of Bella Vista, owner of a polished concrete company who is also a photographer and drone owner.

Both existing rules and the proposed FAA regulations make it illegal to fly them above 500 feet, the minimum safe altitude for manned aircraft. They are forbidden to fly within five miles of a major airport or leave the line of sight of the operator. They would only be allowed to operate in daylight hours.

The FAA has the authority to punish drone operators for unsafe operation under the same laws restricting flights by pilots of regular aircraft, courts have ruled. For example, someone who flies an aircraft over large public gatherings or places where any flights are restricted, such as over some national parks, public buildings or defense installations, could face fines and up to a year in prison.

An unmanned drone beer delivery service for ice fishermen in Minnesota was shut down by the FAA last year when told the practice violated the “noncommercial” drone restriction.

State laws can also apply. Arkansas has anti-voyeurism laws that prohibit invasions of privacy and which apply to those using drone cameras under amendments to that law made in the last legislative session.

Out-of-state, two people were arrested in July 2014 on “reckless endangerment” charges when a New York Police Department helicopter had to swerve to avoid their drone, according to news accounts. Six months before, New York police arrested a Brooklyn man for the same charge after he lost control of his remote control helicopter. The craft crashed, falling so far that authorities believed it substantially risked the safety of others.

Not all the legal risks involving drones are faced by owners and operators. William H. Merideth, 47, of Hillview, Ky., shot down a drone flying over his house recently. He was charged with first-degree criminal mischief and first-degree wanton endangerment for discharging a firearm within city limits and destroying the $1,800 drone.

“They’re going to be like guns,” Harmon said of remotely piloted aircraft. “Most people with guns are responsible. Some are not.”

In May, an airliner approaching LaGuardia Airport in New York reported passing near a drone at an altitude of 2,700 feet. It was the third report of a drone near the airport that month. Even small drones can attain altitudes of 2,000 feet if restrictions are ignored, according to industry figures.

Other countries farther along in the commercial drone approval process have had near misses. A passenger liner coming in for a landing at London’s Heathrow Airport missed a drone in July 2014. Safety authorities in Britain ruled there had been a serious risk of collision after confirming witness accounts. Crew on the aircraft said their Airbus A320 passed within 20 feet of the drone, whose owner was never identified.

This year, a Lufthansa airliner crew flying from Munich to Warsaw on July 20 reported spotting a drone as the plane came in for a landing at its destination, passing within 100 meters or 330 feet on the approach.

Irresponsible drone operators do what they do to get pictures no one else can get if they follow the rules, Harmon said. Yet the irresponsible operators don’t get “bragging rights” unless they show the pictures somewhere — in effect, providing photographic evidence that they broke the rules.

“When we see a picture somebody posts on the Internet, we can tell when it was taken from higher than 500 feet,” he said.

“I’m on a Facebook page with a lot of other drone owners,” Harmon said. “We know some members of our group work for the FAA. We’re not stupid. We know they’re there, but don’t know exactly which ones they are because we don’t ask. But when somebody posts a picture, you can bet someone will respond with something like ‘Hey, that’s not right and here’s why.’ If he gets really detailed and cites a lot of rules, you can bet he’s with the FAA. ”

Even more effectively, Harmon said, FAA regulations can be written into the computer software that controls drones, Harmon said. Updates and patches to that software could add it, he said. Harmon bought a drone with computer software in it that will land the craft automatically if it flies within five miles of an airport, he said.

The landing would come after warnings to the operator he is approaching the airport. Not all models have that feature, but they could, he said.

“Sure, you can hack the software and get around it, but the average Joe can’t,” Harmon said. “You’d really have to know what you’re doing and be pretty good at it.”

A former volunteer firefighter for the Pea Ridge Fire Department, Harmon voluntarily piloted his drone in a search for two concert-goers in Oklahoma who went missing in a flood, he said. Their bodies were later found by others outside of the area Harmon was searching. Harmon used a camera attached to a drone to conduct thorough inspections of hard-to-reach places and to cover wide areas by flying a pattern over them.

“The advantage of a drone is that you can stay over an area, fly close to the ground and really examine a place closely,” he said. “We had people looking at the images from the drone flight on Facebook. If they thought they saw something, we’d go back and look at that spot.”

As for business potential, Harmon sees it as a sideline that will offer options to his existing photography business in the future.

“People hire me for the pictures I take with the camera in my hand, not for what I can do with a drone,” he said. “Real estate is going to be really big, though. People will be able to provide pictures that show the whole property from above.”

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2015/aug/03/drone-safety-record-good-so-far-2015080/?latest