How are environmentalists putting drones to use to help further their causes?

L_111914-research-droneDear EarthTalk: How are environmentalists putting drones to use to help further their causes?
– Joe Martin, Baltimore, MD

Conservationists are utilizing drone or “unmanned aerial systems” (UAS) technology to gather highly detailed imagery and other environmental data that is traditionally challenging to obtain. Wildlife biologist John Takekawa and his team at the U.S. Geological Survey’s Western Ecological Research Center (WERC), for example, are using drones to obtain aerial images of San Francisco Bay marshlands.

“It’s very hard to get some of the data sets in some of these areas that are remote or hard to reach in the marshes,” Takekawa explains. “If you have something that can fly over and get sensors that can report back to your computer, that’s what we’re looking for in exploring these types of technologies.”

Dr. Amy Woodget, a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Worcester in the UK, uses her small Draganflyer X6 UAS to collect high-resolution imagery of river channels. The images map the physical conditions within the rivers, including the channel topography, water depth and surface flow patterns, data all crucial for gauging river health and habitat conditions essential to the survival of local wildlife.

“The results obtained using UAS technologies provide unprecedented levels of detail concerning these physical river habitat parameters, with high levels of accuracy and precision,” Woodget says.

Drones are also helping preserve the Peruvian Amazon forest, where illegal gold mining and logging has cleared mahogany, Spanish cedar and other old-growth trees. Carlos Castaneda, coordinator of the Amazon Basin Conservation Association’s Los Amigos Conservation Concession, monitors the 550-square-mile Los Amigos reserve in southeastern Peru, home to a large diversity of plant and animal species, including palm swamps, bamboo thickets, giant otters, harpy eagles, spider monkeys and jaguars. Small drones weighing less than five pounds enable detection of any deforestation within the area.

Considering that more and more drones are being launched for conservation research, Linda Rothschild, an evolutionary biologist at NASA’s Ames Research Center, was concerned when she found out that UAVs sometimes get lost in coral reefs or other sensitive habitats. “As I started to hear about this, I thought, ‘Well, wouldn’t it be useful if the UAV was biodegradable, so if it crashed somewhere that was sensitive, it wouldn’t matter if it dissolved,’” Rothschild says.

So Rothschild created a biodegradable drone with a team of students in the 2014 International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition. The team’s prototype took its first short flight in November 2014 at the iGEM competition in Boston. The drone, which resembles a cardboard cup holder, is made primarily of mycelium grown by New York-based Ecovative Design. The team grew cellulose leather-like sheets to coat the mycelium body and then covered the sheets with proteins sourced from the saliva of paper wasps—a water resistant material that the insects use to cover their nests. The biodegradable drone body is certainly a step forward, though the drone still uses a standard battery, motor and propellers.

Rothschild’s dream is to make a UAV where every part is made with something biodegradable, but for now, she says, “realistically, this is going to be much more of a hybrid vehicle.”

 

http://augustafreepress.com/how-are-environmentalists-putting-drones-to-use-to-help-further-their-causes/

Drones used to monitor bears send their heart rates through the roof

Hear rate monitors revealed higher stress levels than visible activity indicated.


Wildlife researchers have long struggled with removing the human element whenever possible, so as to monitor patterns like mating and migration without getting in the way. Hidden cameras help, but can only provide so much data. In recent years, camera-mounted drones have been considered for research, and the short-term data looked promising; in particular, anecdotal evidence suggested animals weren’t changing their activity much with drones flying overhead.

A research team at the University of Minnesota wondered if anything unseen might be happening during drone studies. So they put biologger collars on four adult bears and two cubs, then flew drones an average of 21 meters above their heads (and an average of 215 meters absolute distance) for five-minute spans. The results, published in Current Biology on Thursday, included a noticeable heart rate spike for all flown-over bears while the crafts were overhead.

In those five-minute windows, one bear’s heart rate climbed all the way from 41 beats per minute to 162, while the rest of the bears saw beats-per-minute jumps as low as 30 and as high as 80. Still, each bear had the spike in common, along with a resulting drop to a normal heartrate shortly afterward. This came despite a seeming lack of visible response, with the exception of one bear that appeared to react. The bears in the study included two mama bears and their respective cubs; a lone male bear; and a female bear on the verge of hibernation.

The study noted that the bears’ relatively quick heart rate recovery may be influenced by living in close proximity to human activity like farming and automobiles, but added that drones have the potential to “induce higher levels of stress” than higher-flying planes. After referring to a similar February study about drones’ impact on bird populations—which didn’t measure heart rate or other invisible stress indicators—the University of Minnesota researchers implored the scientific community to “answer important questions” before expanding research use of drones, “especially with regard to endangered species or areas of refuge.”

A 3DRobotics Iris drone, mounted with a GoPro HERO3+ camera, was used in each test; that drone has since been replaced with an Iris+ model, but even that model’s noise has been described to be “as loud as one thousand bees and a hummingbird.”

Party pooper

Some people certainly didn’t need to read such a story to recognize the ecologically disruptive ecological of unmanned drone aircraft. In at least one case, that’s the whole point.

Ottawa photographer Steve Wambolt started using a drone two years ago to take aerial shots of the city, but after being encouraged by city councilors, he modified his craft to create the “Goosebuster.” As The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, that six-rotor craft, armed with speakers that play the sounds of predatory birds, has been used ever since to shoo Canadian geese, and their pounds of poop, off the Petrie Island beach near his home.

He has since submitted a proposal to the Ottawa city council to expand his vigilante operation to scare the geese away from all city parks. According to the WSJ report, however, he has received opposition from the very councilor who asked for goose relief in the first place. Wambolt’s current campaign doesn’t appear to run afoul (yes, pun intended) of Ottawan drone rules, which currently require a permit for devices over 35kg and prohibit operating such devices near airports or higher than 90 meters in the air.

 

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/08/drones-used-to-monitor-bears-send-their-heart-rates-through-the-roof/

 

Related:

http://www.iconaerialmedia.com/2015/08/14/drone-flights-overhead-cause-stress-for-black-bears-study-says/

 

Canadians Find Another Use for Drones: Chasing Geese

Entrepreneur looks to rid Ottawa of pesky fowl, but others want to name Canada goose as national bird

Steve Wambolt wants to help clear Ottawa of the Canada Goose by using a squadron of drones to chase away the birds. Photo: Alistair MacDonald/The Wall Street Journal

OTTAWA—Two years ago, photographer Steve Wambolt pitched Ottawa city councilors on a plan to use his drone to take aerial shots of Ottawa. Councilor Bob Monette leaned over with a question: Can that thing be used to chase Canada geese?

Canada geese
Canada geese

“I’m sitting in my suit thinking, this guy is nuts,” Mr. Wambolt said.

But the answer to that question turned out to be yes. Mr. Wambolt’s drone has succeeded where years of sound decoys, dogs and sickly-tasting compounds failed, ridding the city beach on Petrie Island of a goose that can drop 2 pounds of poop a day.

Now Mr. Wambolt has big ambitions. He wants to clear Canada’s capital of the Canada goose, by creating a squadron of drones to be flown from strategic stations around Ottawa.

That could ruffle feathers in a country with a highly conflicted view of the goose to which it has given its name. While reviled for its ability to defecate every 20 minutes, Branta Canadensis is often seen here as a hardy survivor whose noisy migration home in the spring sounds the welcome end of another long winter.

Some Canadians are even leaning toward naming this goose its “national bird,” in the same way the U.S. has the Bald Eagle. The Royal Canadian Geographical Society is currently asking Canadians to choose a national bird by voting online, and plans to lobby the government to make the winner part of national celebrations in 2017 marking 150 years of the country’s confederation.

“Among the first to arrive in spring, and last to leave in winter, they mate for life and both parents share in raising their young,” Canadian novelist Will Ferguson wrote, praising the Canada goose’s loyalty on the geographical society’s website.

“If I’m going to be chased through a public park anyway, I would rather it be by a national emblem,” said Mr. Ferguson, who has written humorous books on Canadian culture.

The prospect of the goose winning the title leaves Mr. Wambolt with a tough pitch: Chasing what could be the national bird out of the nation’s capital.

On a recent visit to Petrie Island, Mr. Wambolt pointed to the rationale for his pitch, the spotless grass.

“I’ll give you a dollar for every piece of poop you find,” he said. “Last year, you couldn’t even walk here for it.”

Canada Geese swim at Andrew Hayden Park. ENLARGE
Canada Geese swim at Andrew Hayden Park. Photo: Alistair MacDonald/The Wall Street Journal

For Petrie Island park janitor André Killeen, Mr. Wambolt’s drone couldn’t have been more welcome. It had been Mr. Killeen’s job to clean up after the 300-odd geese that used to gather on this beach.

“It doesn’t break well, it just smears,” he said. “That drone has been remarkably efficient.”

The Goosebuster, as Mr. Wambolt calls his drone, is 26 inches wide with six rotors. It has a number of modifications, including speakers that blast the sounds of predator birds, such as eagles, hawks and buzzards, a strobe light and a coat of black paint.

“They don’t like the color black,” he said.

The Goosebuster comes as the North American goose population, once in decline, is on the rise. The U.S. government’s Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that last year there were at least 4.8 million Canada geese in North America.

The geese thrive among the manicured lawns of the golf courses and public spaces that they like to graze upon. Left unchecked, urban goose populations can double in size every few years, according to the City of Ottawa.

Mission accomplished on Petrie, Mr. Wambolt is now setting his sights on fresh—albeit soiled—fields.

At Andrew Haydon Park, on the other side of the city, Mr. Wambolt moved stealthily over the rolling lawns clutching his drone.

“What we are looking for is footprints and goose poop,” he said. Within minutes, this former Canadian soldier had spotted an abundance of both. He shook his head in disgust at the piles of poop covering both path and grass.

Soon, Mr. Wambolt spotted a gaggle of geese heading out of the Ottawa River. “Look at that big mama sitting in the middle of them,” he said.

Mr. Wambolt set his drone to the sound of an eagle and flew it up over the geese, sending them fleeing, honking, back toward the river. In repeated flybys, it took only minutes for Mr. Wambolt to herd the entire flock back into the river.

Ridding the parks of the droppings isn’t just about aesthetics, Mr. Wambolt and others say. The waste can contain bacteria ranging from E. coli to listeria and pose a health risk to the children who frequent city parks.

Denise Clarke says her young grandchildren no longer want to come to Andrew Haydon Park, fearful of aggressive geese and their slippery excrement. Canada geese will occasionally attack people when they feel their family is under threat.

“I hope it works,” she said, looking at Mr. Wambolt’s Goosebuster.

Not everybody in the park is a fan of the Goosebuster. Linda Hay had been photographing the “big mama” before Mr. Wambolt’s drone chased it off. The bird was actually a Brant goose from the Arctic, one of 69 different bird species in Andrew Haydon Park, Ms. Hay said.

“They are beautiful, and if you scare the geese, you will scare everything else away,” she said.

Recently, Mr. Wambolt wrote up a proposal to clear all of Ottawa’s parks of geese and submitted it to the city council. But it faces opposition, including from the city councilor, Mr. Monette, who first suggested using the drone to target geese. “I don’t think anybody wants to get rid of them, period,” Mr. Monette said.

In Andrew Haydon Park, Mr. Wambolt’s appearance continued to generate debate among gathering birders about whether the goose was worthy of being a national symbol.

“No, no, no,” said Roy John, a member of the Monday Morning Birders Club. “The Black-capped Chickadee is cheerful in all weathers, it’s tame, it’s friendly, it’s very Canadian,” he said.

The birders’ arrival at the park had sent Mr. Wambolt back to his car, much as he had sent the geese back into the river.

Asked why not the goose for national bird, Mr. John pointed to a path caked in its fecal matter: “Canada geese are everywhere in Canada.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/canadians-find-another-use-for-drones-chasing-geese-1439510869

Drone flights overhead cause stress for black bears, study says

mother-bear-and-cub

By Lisa Johnson, CBC News

Drones operated by researchers may have unintended consequences for wildlife, warns the lead author of a new study showing the buzzing of unmanned aerial vehicles overhead can leave black bears stressed, with racing hearts.

Researchers flew drones about 20 metres above black bears that were wearing GPS collars and cardiac monitors to measure what effects the unfamiliar noise had on the bears.

Lead author Mark Ditmer said they thought the bears might flee, but they hardly moved at all.

Instead, their heart rates spiked, showing a major stress response.

“For them to mostly stay in one spot, and have this racing heart rate, was a little bit of a surprise for us,” said Ditmer, a postdoctoral researcher in conservation biology at the University of Minnesota who led the study published in Current Biology.

Stress response ‘pretty severe’

The team gathered data on the bears’ movement while the drones flew, with the collars sending a new location every two minutes as the bears ambled through corn fields and aspen forests in northwestern Minnesota.

But they had to wait until the bears were in hibernation before downloading the heart rate data.

The researchers had expected some physiological reaction to the unfamiliar buzzing overhead, but not such a strong response, said Ditmer.

“I couldn’t believe it,” said Ditmer.

“It became strikingly obvious that we were seeing a pretty acute stress response that was pretty severe, at least in some cases.”

In the most extreme case — a mother bear with two cubs — the bear’s heart rate spiked to 400 per cent of her resting rate, jumping from 41 beats per minute before the drone flight to 162 beats per minute when the drone circled overhead.

That kind of stress response, which likely also included a surge of adrenalin and other changes, helps a wild animal in a real emergency, but chronically stressed individuals are more susceptible to disease and other problems, said Ditmer.

‘Cautionary tale’

Ditmer and colleagues wanted to look at the bears’ reaction, because drones are increasingly used in research and conservation — not to mention by hobbyists — with little known about their effects on wildlife.

This study was limited to 18 flights over the four adult bears in a zone where federal rules allowed drone flights. Other types of wildlife would respond differently to the unfamiliar sound of a drone, said Ditmer.

Still, he hopes it’s a “cautionary tale” as drone use increases.

“Just because we’re not noticing an animal changing behaviour, that doesn’t mean there’s not some sort of negative response happening.”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/drone-flights-overhead-cause-stress-for-black-bears-study-says-1.3188549

French seaside town brings in drone to tackle ‘carnivorous’ seagull invasion

Trouville-sur-Mer claims to be first town to test a special drone that can spot seagull nests and spray them with steriliser, as deputy mayor warns the birds could soon “make off with a baby”

The hungry birds have been known to attack holidaymakers for their food

Towns along the coast of Normandy are at a loss at how to keep seagulls in check Photo: SWNS

Trouville-sur-Mer in Normany, northern France, claims to be first town to test a special drone that can spot seagull nests and spray them with steriliser, as its deputy mayor warned that the birds could soon “make off with a baby”.

“They are profoundly changing their living habits from eating fish and building nests on cliffs to living in towns and becoming carnivorous as it is much easier to find food,” said Pascale Cordier, Trouville’s deputy mayor in charge of environment.

She said a woman had recently suffered a brutal gull attack when she unwittingly approached a chick on a pavement, and was violently pecked in the calves.

Trouville-sur-Mer

“They are no longer scared of man at all, and I’m worried that one of these days they’ll make off with a baby,” she said.

Local fisherman say the gulls regularly dive bomb them on their trawlers but they can do nothing as the gulls have been a protected species since 2009.

Instead of culling the birds, the town has used climbers to scale buildings and spray eggs with a mixture of formalin and paraffin to euthanise the chicks and keep the teeming population in check.

However, last year, a council climber was seriously injured after falling off a particularly precarious perch.

A robotic expert at the College de France, the country’s most illustrious university, suggested that Trouville devise a drone to spot seagull nests perched on roofs and buildings. They then swoop over them to spray the eggs with steriliser.

Built by Civic Drone, a company in the Paris area, the device is also protected by a buffer to fend off gull attacks and to keep the birds from being sliced by its sharp blades.

The resort has tested an 'anti-seagull' drone The seaside resort in France has tested an ‘anti-seagull’ drone

“This job takes a lot of time if you do it by hand and the risks of accidents very are high, whereas here it takes two minutes to sterilise the eggs,” Fabien Lanzini of Civic Drone told TF1.

However, the new anti-seagull technique has hit a snag.

France’s League for the Protection of Birds has filed a complaint with French aviation authorities, which has ordered the town to stop using the drone for now.

“A meeting is due in September to get authorisation and I’m convinced this will be a solution going forward,” said Ms Cordier.

France’s problem with “goëlands”, a term to describe larger gulls, still pales into comparison to recent attacks in Britain.

Last month, David Cameron called for a “big conversation” on the issue after gulls killed a Yorkshire Terrier in Newquay, a Chihuahua puppy in Devon and a pet tortoise in Cornwall called Stig.

Mr Cameron told BBC Radio Cornwall: “It is a dangerous one for the prime minister to dive in and come up with an instant answer with the issues of the protection of seagulls, whether there is a need for a cull, what should be done about eggs and nests.

“I think a big conversation needs to happen about this.”

Cornwall pensioner Sue Atkinson was left battered and bloodied after a seagull attack yards from a primary school. She said: “It was like a scene from the film The Birds.”

British MPs recently called for a change in the law to allow the protected status of seagulls to be axed so that their population in urban areas could be better controlled.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11798697/French-seaside-town-brings-in-drone-to-tackle-carnivorous-seagull-invasion.html