Akron, OH: Startup, Event 38, is bringing drone technology down on the farm

e384arkon

By Robert L. Smith, The Plain Dealer

AKRON, Ohio–Drinking in the scene as you drive through Ohio farm country these days, you might guess that the corn is about as high as an elephant’s eye, as the oldsong goes.

Farmers, it turns out, need a surer assessment of the height and the health of their crops. Unseen pests and weeds can hobble those racing rows of corn. It’s not easy to inspect hundreds of acres of soybeans near the full bloom of harvest.

Jeff Taylor, a 27-year old rocket scientist with a passion for unmanned aircraft, is offering farmers a new, bird’s eye view. His Akron startup, Event 38 Unmanned Systems, is bringing drone technology to the farm belt –and maybe giving Ohio an edge in a blossoming industry.

Taylor’s pilotless, miniature airplanes–which snap high-resolution photos of crops, cattle, soil and much else that farmers worry about–are selling about as fast as he can make them.

Brisk online sales hint at a market ready to mushroom. The company is selling 15 to 20 drones a month, with about half going abroad, Taylor said.

Drones remain a little outlaw, as inventors and entrepreneurs wait for the Federal Aviation Administration to write the rules of the game. But most experts agree a new industry is dawning fast.  As it pioneers a niche, Event 38 is expecting to soar.

John Blair, a seasoned entrepreneur from San Francisco, recently joined the two-year-old company as second in command. He’s assembling an executive team and looking for capital to build out the technology platform.

Meanwhile, the company is working with Ohio State University’s Agricultural Research and Development Center in Wooster, refining the art of crop scouting.

And Taylor, an aerospace engineering graduate of Case Western Reserve University, is nearing his dream of seeing drones put to useful, even essential use.

He’s been tinkering with flying machines for years, building better, cheaper and more helpful drones as fellow hobbyists were content to race them through the air, he says.

“I thought, ‘Man, I’ve got to get this out there,” he said of his work. “These things could be useful to a lot of people.”

One of his first jobs, with spacecraft maker SpaceX in California, gave him the company name. His part of a space flight project had the dramatic title Event 38.

read more http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2014/09/an_akron_startup_event_38_is_b.html

Lily Robotics, Maker Of Self-Flying Drones, Seeking To Raise $15.5 Million At $100 Million Valuation

lily2

By Aaron Tilley and Ryan Mac

In May, Lily Robotics received a flurry of attention when it announced the pre-sale campaign for its flagship drone, which came with a slick launch video that showed a device that could be thrown in the air and autonomously follow its user. A little more than three months later, it’s no surprise that the company has also attracted the glances of investors.

According to regulatory filings provided to FORBES by VC Experts, a private market research firm, Lily is seeking to raise $15.5 million in a Series A round that would value the company at more than $100 million. It’s unclear whether any deal has closed, though one source suggested that the company was in talks with Boston-based Spark Capital to lead the round. Lily also raised $1 million in seed funding in 2014.

The company did not respond to a request for comment on its proposed funding round. Spark Capital also did not return a request for comment.

If Lily is able to raise the funding amount, it would be a significant accomplishment for a company that has yet to begin shipping its product. FORBES was able to the test the drone last May in San Francisco and it mostly worked, taking off when thrown into the air and following a demonstrator around without controls. It did not cooperate for everyone, however, as seen in this messy trial for The Guardian. Industry sources who are skeptical of the product noted that proposed features like the “follow me” capability take years of research to perfect and will be difficult to safely deploy in live environments.

Funding for drone companies has skyrocketed in the past year, especially in the consumer market. Chipmaker Intel INTC -3.57% invested $60 million into Chinese drone maker Yuneec in August, besting the $42 million raised by another Chinese manufacturer, Ehang, earlier in the month. In May, Shenzhen-based DJI, the world’s largest consumer drone manufacturer, raised $75 million at an $8 billion valuation from Accel Partners.

When it is complete, the Lily drone will be a quadcopter that can follow a user at speeds of up to 25 miles-per-hour at a height of 10 to 30 feet, the company said. The device will also include a  camera to capture high-definition video  (1080p at 60 frame-per-second.) Lily is positioning itself as a competitor with GoPro, which is set to unveil its own drone later this year.

New Zealand: Strict drone laws limit opportunities in Invercargill, broadcaster Jason Gutteridge says

JasonGutteridge

BLAKE FODEN

Invercargill is missing out on promotional opportunities because of strict rules around flying drones, a broadcaster says.

Jason Gutteridge landed himself in hot water with the Civil Aviation Authority after footage he shot above Oreti Park Speedway for a weekly speedway programme on Face TV – SKY channel 83 – was deemed illegal.

The area is a no-operation zone because it is used by aeroplane pilots for low-flying practice.

“We’ve got New Zealand’s largest motorsport park and you can’t fly a drone there. They’re the way of the future,” Gutteridge said.

“Is it right that we’ve got a multi-million dollar broadcast truck to showcase this area where there’s so much going on, but we can’t show it to its full potential?

“Surely it’s easier to move a low-flying zone than a motorsport park.”

Gutteridge questioned why the low-flying zone would be designated over the popular recreational area at Sandy Point.

The deaths of 11 people in a plane crash during a UK air show last month showed it was not safe to be doing training in those areas, he said.

He also believed more education was needed on the rules around operating drones.

Venture Southland tourism digital marketer Dan Burt said the agency planned to work with Airways – who managed airspace for the CAA – to see whether the no-operation zone could be moved.

They were looking at having it over farmland near Riverton, he said.

“It’s something we would really like to consider changing,” Burt said.

“It would give us leverage to show off some really cool parts of the region and cool events like the Burt Munro Challenge.

“The angle and perspective you can give from up there is unparalleled in terms of how we can showcase our region and what’s going on in it.”

Burt said he understood the low-flying zone had been in place for at least seven years.

“Now that this kind of technology is around it’s something that needs to be looked at.”

When asked for a response to Gutteridge’s concerns, a CAA spokesman emailed a response but did not address the potential for the low-flying zone to be moved.

The zone was in a controlled airspace that was on a final approach for some air traffic flying to the Invercargill airport, and even if it did not exist, anyone wanting to fly above the speedway would still need permission from Air Traffic Control, the spokesman said.

Gutteridge had shown “wilful non-compliance” and had been told several times by the local Air Traffic Control unit that he could not operate his aircraft in the area, they said.

Gutteridge admitted he knew the rules when he flew on that occasion, for which he was fined $1000, but said he was unaware of them when he received his first fine of $500 for flying within 4km of the Invercargill airport.

He was also fined $1000 for flying at Riverside Speedway, which is outside the 4km airport zone but within the low-flying area, which he said he was not aware of at the time.

“I deserved the fines and I should have checked the rules, but surely education is better than just heavy-handed fines,” Gutteridge said.

“Once I knew, I worked really hard to become compliant and make sure other people were compliant too.”

Read more http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/71751361/strict-drone-laws-limit-opportunities-in-invercargill-broadcaster-jason-gutteridge-says

Canada: Vancouver drone store looted twice in two days

dronestorerobbery

Jon Woodward, CTV News, Reporter

Only a day after a clerk’s wallet was stolen from under her nose, a Vancouver drones store was targeted again – this time for $15,000 worth of merchandise.

Security camera footage shows two people in black entering Drones Plus on Fourth Avenue from the rear at 1:24 am, and loading expensive drones, cameras and iPads into what appears to be black garbage bags.

The man then leaves through the back door. The video shows them walking down the street with bikes, carrying the bags.

“We don’t know if this is in relation to the theft of our employee’s wallet, if the store was being cased, or if this is a completely unrelated crime, but we are looking for the media and public’s help in this situation,” said Abi Wright, the director of marketing and media relations for Drones Plus.

Wright said she’s hoping that if someone saw anything they can contact the company and let them know any information.

Only a day before, store clerk Yabsera Aklilu was approached by a man looking to use the store’s phone. He said he had locked his keys and his dog in his car.

But while she was distracted, he grabbed her wallet and passport. Aklilu is an Ethopian citizen and replacing the passport is difficult. She needs the passport to travel on a vacation, which looks like it won’t happen now.

It’s not the first time the chain has been targeted. The company says it’s their seventh robbery in a chain of 12 stores between the US and Canada.

That includes a sudden heist in a Los Angeles store where six people in white coveralls burst in and stole another $15,000 worth of drones in August, and a fraud case in Toronto. Store co-founder Mike Thorpe speculated that drones are popular with customers – which makes them tempting for criminals as well.

“We need help and we’re asking that of our media partners and community,” Wright.

The company has shared serial numbers of the drones with police and staff are asking people to be on the lookout for craigslist ads that seem suspicious.

Police officers attended the store Thursday.

The store says it received some tips about the identity of the wallet-stealer and passed them onto the Vancouver Police.

http://bc.ctvnews.ca/vancouver-drone-store-looted-twice-in-two-days-1.2548558

New Zealand:- Rise of ‘mass jackassery’ in the drone community

ChrisANZ

The chief executive of a consumer drone maker wants the cowboys who have tarnished the name of the hobby to have their wings clipped.

Chris Anderson, the co-founder and chief executive of 3D Robotics, has even coined a term for the phenomenon: “mass jackassery”.

“[It’s] bad and it’s going to get worse. And if we don’t do something about it, no one’s been killed yet, but someone’s going to do something really stupid,” he said.

​Witness the drone which crash landed in the stadium last week during a tennis match at the US Open. Read about the increasing number of drone sightings by pilots of civilian aircraft. Or listen to the complaints made by firefighters and emergency workers when drones interfere with their work.

And the rise in these kinds of incidents have resulted in some people taking the law into their own hands. And it’s not just humans. Even chimpanzees are taken to bringing down snooping drones.

“One of the ironies of this drone age is that because we’ve made drones so easy to fly and the process of learning to fly and all the safety and responsibility lessons that come with it are now no longer required,” Anderson said.

“As a result, all that wisdom about safe and responsible flight doesn’t come automatically. A bunch of people are doing dumb things. Not because they’re bad or evil; just because they don’t know better.”

SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM

But he’s not arguing for more regulation. Governments all over the world struggle to keep up with technological changes and concerns about the safety and privacy implications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

The solution, says Anderson, needs to come from the industry itself with the use of software to “geofence” drones so that they cannot fly where they are not supposed to.

And as a best-selling author, long-time editor of WIRED magazine and now the boss of a start-up cranking out hardware that supports that storytelling, he above all should know such a golden age when he sees one.

He says we’re now in the third era of consumer drones. The first was getting them to fly. The second was attaching cameras and stabilising them enough to be able to shoot good video.

“But it turns out that is not enough,” he says. “We’d rather be in front of the camera instead of behind it. We’d rather be the stars of the movie, not the directors of our movies.”

Just as software will solve the problem of the aerial pests and triumph over the hardware-first philosophy of his leading competitor, so too has it ushered in the third era. And it has done this by taking the variables out of piloting a drone and replaced it with push-button autonomy.

“We think that what makes drones special is that they don’t have to be piloted, they are autonomous. You don’t have to be sitting behind the camera like a nerd with sticks. You’re just living your life and the drones can capture the moment.”

“Using the smartness of the drone to inform the user about how to responsibly behave is ultimately how we’re going to solve this problem,” he said.

In New Zealand, drones are still a novelty hobby pursued by a few. But just as in the US, the market is growing and going mainstream. Most major electronic goods retailers now stock one or more drone models, and with Christmas around the corner, you can expect to see many more of them popping up in the wide open yonder over summer.

Anderson acknowledges that taking away market share is going to be a challenge. “DJI is definitely the market leader and they’re a great company,” he said.

CAPTURING THE MOMENT

Anderson calls this the golden age of personal storytelling.

And as a best-selling author, long-time editor of WIRED magazine and now the boss of a start-up cranking out hardware that supports that storytelling, he above all should know such a golden age when he sees one.

He says we’re now in the third era of consumer drones. The first was getting them to fly. The second was attaching cameras and stabilising them enough to be able to shoot good video.

“But it turns out that is not enough,” he says. “We’d rather be in front of the camera instead of behind it. We’d rather be the stars of the movie, not the directors of our movies.”

Just as software will solve the problem of the aerial pests and triumph over the hardware-first philosophy of his leading competitor, so too has it ushered in the third era. And it has done this by taking the variables out of piloting a drone and replaced it with push-button autonomy.

“We think that what makes drones special is that they don’t have to be piloted, they are autonomous. You don’t have to be sitting behind the camera like a nerd with sticks. You’re just living your life and the drones can capture the moment.”

http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/gadgets/71811380/rise-of-mass-jackassery-in-the-drone-community

Drone crashes into stands during US Open match; no injuries

AP – Sports
Drone crashes into stands during US Open match; no injures

.

View gallery

Police officers investigate the southwest corner of Louis Armstrong Stadium after a drone flew over the …

NEW YORK (AP) — A drone buzzed over the court during a U.S. Open match in Louis Armstrong Stadium on Thursday night and crashed into an empty section of seats

U.S. Tennis Association spokesman Chris Widmaier said no one was injured and that the New York Police Department was ”conducting an ongoing investigation.”

The black device flew diagonally through the arena during the next-to-last game of a second-round match that 26th-seeded Flavia Pennetta of Italy won 6-1, 6-4 over Monica Niculescu of Romania.

Pennetta said she heard the drone fly by and was not sure what it was.

Her initial reaction, she said afterward, was that it might have been a bomb.

”A little bit scary, I have to say,” Pennetta said.

”With everything going on in the world … I thought, ‘OK, it’s over.’ That’s how things happen,” she said.

She said neither the chair umpire nor tournament officials told her that it was, indeed, a drone.

It broke into pieces upon landing, and the match was only briefly interrupted between points while police and fire department personnel went to look at it.

”The chair umpire just wanted to wait for an OK from the police to be able to continue,” Pennetta said, ”even if, truthfully, I don’t think even they knew what it was.”

She said her coach and physical therapist were sitting in the opposite end of the stadium from where the drone crashed and they told her later they were afraid, too.

”All of these (security measures), and then it comes in from above,” Pennetta said.

The episode happened a little before 8:30 p.m., during the day’s last match in Louis Armstrong Stadium, which has a seating capacity of about 10,000. Pennetta and Niculescu originally were scheduled to play on much smaller Court 17, but their match was moved because four earlier matches in Armstrong wrapped up early.

”If there had been spectators, it would have hit them and done a lot of damage,” Pennetta said.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/drone-crashes-stands-during-us-open-match-no-023153674–ten.html

New Zealand: Christchurch drone operator urges suspicious public to stay grounded

carlsheppard

CHRIS BARCLAY

Commercial drones operators are urging the public not to become paranoid after a spate of privacy stoushes.

The increasing use of drones has raised concerns about potential invasions of privacy, particularly after the Civil Aviation Authority introduced new regulations covering the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on August 1.

In Timaru last month, police spoke to a drone operator after his machine followed a woman home from a dairy.

Charges were considered under the Harassment Act but no further action was taken because officers accepted the man was just learning to fly the drone.

However, Simon Done was sentenced to 80 hours’ community work and ordered to pay drone owner Aaron Wagstaff reparation after he stomped on his $1700 “Phantom 3″.

The remote-controlled craft had been taking scenic shots over an estuary Waikanae, north of Wellington, last month.

Done, who was found guilty of intentional damage, said he was concerned about people recording footage from drones and was standing up for personal privacy.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/71690171/Christchurch-drone-operator-urges-suspicious-public-to-stay-grounded

FAA Selects New Unmanned Aircraft Executives

FAA-Puma1

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has selected Marke “Hoot” Gibson and Earl Lawrence for two executive-level positions that will guide the agency’s approach to safe, timely and efficient integration of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into U.S. airspace.

Hoot Gibson will become the Senior Advisor on UAS Integration, a position established to focus on external outreach and education, inter-agency initiatives and an enterprise-level approach to FAA management of UAS integration efforts.  He will report directly to the FAA Deputy Administrator.

Gibson previously served as Executive Director of the NextGen Institute, which provides professional services to the UAS Joint Program Development Office. He has also owned his own aviation consulting firm, and held numerous senior command and staff positions  during a 33-year U.S. Air Force career.

Earl Lawrence will become the Director of the UAS Integration Office within the FAA’s Aviation Safety organization. He will lead the FAA’s efforts to safely and effectively integrate UAS into the nation’s airspace.

During almost five years as Director of the FAA Small Airplane Directorate, Lawrence was responsible for 17 aircraft certification and manufacturing district offices in 21 states from Alaska to Florida. Before coming to the agency in 2010, he had been Vice President for Industry & Regulatory Affairs at the Experimental Aircraft Association since 1994.

Both executives will assume their positions later this month.

For more information on the FAA and UAS, go to http://www.faa.gov/uas.

– See more at: https://www.sensorsandsystems.com/news/top-stories/corporate-news/36915-faa-selects-new-unmanned-aircraft-executives.html#sthash.nI1ypwlc.dpuf

CA: RCAPA response to SB142

RCAPAnew

Dear Governor Brown,

We appeal to you to not sign SB142 into law. We are concerned that the Bill is potentially flawed, as representatives may not fully understand all of the complexities and nuances of safety regulating the national airspace system. It is a complex undertaking not to be taken lightly. That is why the Congress of the United States has made airspace and aircraft the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration and its Administrator.

49 U.S.C §40103. Sovereignty and use of airspace

(a) Sovereignty and Public Right of Transit.—(1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States.

(2) A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace. To further that right, the Secretary of Transportation shall consult with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board established under section 502 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 792) before prescribing a regulation or issuing an order or procedure that will have a significant impact on the accessibility of commercial airports or commercial air transportation for handicapped individuals. (b) Use of Airspace.—(1) The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall develop plans and policy for the use of the navigable airspace and assign by regulation or order the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. The Administrator may modify or revoke an assignment when required in the public interest.

(2) The Administrator shall prescribe air traffic regulations on the flight of aircraft (including regulations on safe altitudes) for—

(A) navigating, protecting, and identifying aircraft;

(B) protecting individuals and property on the ground;

(C) using the navigable airspace efficiently; and

(D) preventing collision between aircraft, between aircraft and land or water vehicles, and between aircraft and airborne objects.

The FAA has been working on promulgating rules for unmanned aircraft and is close to issuing regulations for their safe integration. Again we ask you veto this bill, as we are concerned that all of the risks have been considered and that there may be unintended hazards that could arise as a result of SB 142 becoming law.

On behalf of the Remote Control Aerial Platform Association (RCAPA) membership Respectfully,

Patrick Egan

http://www.suasnews.com/2015/09/38271/rcapa-response-to-sb142/